This blog is about the biggest bastards in US political history.
If George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin & Co. were alive today; they would definitely shoot these bastards!

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Animal Farm

It's so easy to read, even liberals can understand it!

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Ayn Rand's Last Lecture - an Absolute Masterpiece!

"The world you desire can be won - it exists, it is real, you can have it, it's possible, it's yours -- but to win it requires your total dedication and a total break with the world of your past,
with the doctrine that man is a sacrificial animal who exists for the pleasure of others.
Fight for the value of your person
Fight for the virtue of your pride
Fight for that which is the essence of man - for his sovereign rational mind
Fight with the radiant certainty and the absolute rectitude of knowing that yours is the morality of life and that yours is the battle for any achievement, any value, any grandeur, any goodness, any joy, that has ever existed on this earth."

The media - "they are the conditioned robots of their college professors" !

"as far as the feminist movement is concerned - I am a male chauvenist - proudly"

"I would have voted for Ford, he had his flaws, but he was infinitely superior to Reagan"(!)

Monday, December 30, 2013

How to Destroy America

Eight Steps To Destroy America
We all know Dick Lamm as the former Governor of Colorado. In that context, his thoughts are particularly poignant. Last week there was an immigration-overpopulation conference in Washington, DC, filled to capacity by many of American's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college professor named Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book, Mexifornia, explaining how immigration - both legal and illegal - was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream. Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States. He said, "If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'"
"Here is how they do it," Lamm said:
(First) ;
"Turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bi-cultural country. History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. "The historical scholar Seymour Lipset put it this way: 'The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy.' Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans."
Lamm went on:
"Invent 'multi-culturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. I would make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds. "We could make the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort.
The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: 'The apparent success of our own multi-ethnic and multi-cultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrically and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.'" Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural sub-groups living in America reinforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities."
"Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school."
"My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.'I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population."
"My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other." "A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games. A common enemy Persia threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism andgeographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. "E. Pluribus Unum" -- From many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'unum,' we can balkanize America as surely as Kosovo."
"Next to last, (Seventh:) I would place all subjects off limits ~ make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt discussion and debate." "Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,'

(Eighth:) I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America , it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant sympatric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them." In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said, "Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book Mexifornia. His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book." There was no applause. A chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every attendee at the conference. Every American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly, yet pervasively across the United States today. Every discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our educational system and national cohesiveness. Barbaric cultures that practice female genital mutilation are growingas we celebrate 'diversity.' American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as corporations create a Third World in America - take note of California and other states - to date, ten million illegal aliens and growing fast. It is reminiscent of George Orwell's book "1984." In that story, three slogans are engraved in the Ministry of Truth building: "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery," and "Ignorance is strength." Governor Lamm, walked back to his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of this great democracy is deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The American Dream.

Saturday, December 28, 2013

Confirm Your Bias

I want to share with you an exercise in (cognitive) bias:

1) If you throw a piece of paper away, do you put it in the paper recycling bin? If that piece of paper e.g. tissue paper is soiled, do you then put it in the garbage? It’s still paper right, so why not put soiled tissue paper in the paper recycling bin?

2) Did you know that Pluto is no longer a planet? It was reclassified as a 'dwarf-planet'. But a dwarf-planet is still a planet right? Pluto was discovered in 1930, we have been calling it a planet for almost 100 years, but now the ‘experts’ say it is not a planet, but a ‘plutoid’ or dwarf planet.

3) Is Carbon Dioxide a pollutant? This one is important because it makes the difference between millions of dollars in taxes, or not. And YES — they will be coming out of your paycheck not the politicians’.

Can they tax the air we breathe?

Well if you redefine CO2 as a pollutant — they can and do.
CO2 has been around for a long time, and the last thousand years or more of human history, CO2 was NOT called a pollutant. For the last 10 or more years the definition has been wavering. Now however, with new motivation and a new agenda, Washington and Obama have definitively re-defined CO2 as a pollutant; regardless if manmade or naturally occurring.

Now the point of the questions above is not to prove any facts. You will not prove one single fact with them, but magically, what the 3 questions above really do — is reveal your biases.

Beware! Trying this on your family will result in heated debates, be ready!
If you are really feeling good about this try these two:

Syrian ‘Rebels’:
1) Really? When the US fights them in Iraq, they are called 'Insurgents' and it is not a revolution but an 'insurgency' or downright terror campaign.
2) There was no insurgency until the SAudis and Qataris started funding the 'rebels'.

1) There was no reason to re-define CO2 until a certain agenda came along and some politicians needed the new definition to enable their tax scams.
2) Why re-define now?

In the cases above, you will see that the timing is more than dubious, it is actually incriminating.

In every political case, the timing is crucially important.

Some people will say you are being a pedantic-semantic fool for harping on your definitions, the people who say that however, are the ones who end up in 're-education camps' later, 'for their own good' ... of course.

The start of any project must be the definitions, make sure you get them right or you will pay dearly later on when it’s much too late, and never miss a chance to confront someone who is using semantics to rip you off.

Thursday, December 5, 2013

European Hypocrites

Welcome to the blame game:

  1. Spin the dial
  2. Demonize target group

You are a Nazi, you may pick up your NSDAP party badge from your Gauleiter at the door.
All feeble excuses like “That’s different!” and “I am not a Nazi!” will be met with a condescending “Of course you’re not comrade - that’s different” or “Of course you’re not - you’ve changed your names; now you are called communists/progressives/liberals” etc.

The point is; the mentality is the same.
In 1685 it was the illuminati, In 1785 it was the bankers, In 1805 it was the Rothschilds, in 1855 it was the Jewish bankers(Rothschilds), In 1933 it was the Jews, in 1945 it was the industrialists, in 1955 it was the communists(McCarthy), in 1965 it was the elite, in 1975 it was the capitalists, in 1985 it was corporations, in 1995 it was the rich corporations, in 2005 it was the bankers, in 2010 it was the 1% and the bankers,
notice something?
It’s all the same Nazi mentality!

The good old saying “When you point your finger at someone, 3 fingers are pointing back at you”.If you’re looking for problems, or a scapegoat for your problems, the problem IS you.
There’s a disgusting video going around ‘the nets’.
A young Adolf Hitler is run over by a brand new Mercedes.
Most Europeans and Germans laugh at this video.
They fail to recognize themselves in an SS uniform.
It is especially disgusting in Germany where the phrase “never again” is so ingrained and conditioned into the Germans from day 1.
One must remember that in 1933, the Nazis were the ruling party, and this very video was already made in various forms (e.g. Der Ewige Jude), but in their video the child that got run over was Jewish. Everyone laughed ...
Message: “It’s OK to kill children if they’re in the opposing party”
Same as 1933, just different day, different product, same mentality.
Nothing has changed...

I am confronted every day with Europeans and Germans who propose to hate the Nazis, and yet, they have the exact same mentality as the Nazis.
Could it be that they were the majority? That their mentality was 'normal'?
Could it be that the 'normal' mentality from back then is exactly the same 'normal' mentality of ours now? Is this mentality normal at all, a part of the human condition?
I refuse to accept this hypocrisy, I call it out whenever I see it.This does not make me a lot of friends, but I don't want liars and hypocrites as friends.
The Nazis are among us, they have just changed their names, that’s all.
It’s important for us to recognize this downright evil mentality among ALL parties and people, regardless of if they are in the ‘left’ SPD or ‘right’ CDU.
But the Euros and Germans refuse to do this. It would require too much thinking.
Instead it’s much easier to just fall back on the same old false tags of ‘left’, ‘right’, ‘conservative’, ‘nazi’, 'liberal' etc.
This reactionary policy requires no thinking whatsoever. And this is unfortunately all we have nowadays: reactionary politics. The Americans have a great name for this — “Knee jerk politics”.
Knee jerk politics is the politics of the naked ape (see Desmond Morris' book). I like to call it the 'emotional-naked-chimpanzee'.

I have watched how an entire continent called Europe has adored and blindly followed and supported their new idol — Obama. 
Blind allegiance, total adoration, absolute guru syndrome and rock star syndrome. It’s this kind of blind allegiance that produces the next Hitler. 
They said “Oh no, that’s different”, 
I told them Obama has a kill-list, “Oh no, that’s different”, 
I told them Obama supports Double-Tap, “Oh no, that’s different”, 
I told them Obama not only supports all of Bush’s policies, but has added onto them(!), that’s why Edward Snowden, a person who voted for Obama, felt compelled to blow the whistle — “Oh no, that’s different”.  
I told them that to laugh at that video of a car killing a young Adolf is the same as being a Nazi, it makes one as bad as the murderer, “Oh no, that’s different”, 
I asked them why is that different? 
When Adolf was a child, he was also innocent - you killed an innocent child in that video - “Oh no, that’s different”.

I hope to god, that these very people will say “Oh no, that’s different” to the modern Gestapo when they come to take them or their children away.

I hope to god, I am somewhere else at that time, in a really free country.

Friday, November 15, 2013

If You Like Your Healthcare You Can Keep It

  • Responsible
  • Accountable
  • Support
  • Consulted
  • Informed

I remember a day when there was such a thing known as "accountability", and also "responsibility".
In the old days, that is, the Pre-Clinton Era days, when a leader was caught lying, he was held responsible. He got punished, or even impeached.  When we have a war crimes trial, who goes to the Hague -- the foot soldier, or the general? -- or even the President?
Nixon, a man compared to our modern 'leaders'

Nowadays our supposed 'leaders' are of the most cowardly childish sorts. When confronted with their failures they just hold out their arm and point to the person next to them, in an eternal loop of denial.

This is the Crime of Clinton. He made lying fashionable.
Before - there was accountability, now ... nothing.
What the liberals fail to admit, is that true to their own battle cry of "It's Bush's fault", the previous president sets the game-board for the next. Clinton paved the way for 'Bush's Wars' quite literally. He set the field, got all the international players against each other, and then he delivered the next president the tools -- i.e. approved pre-emptive lying -- for the execution of his wars.

This is the failure of the Democrat party that no one wants to fess up to.
Children playing with bombs --  afterwards they will say "yeah but he started it!"

Friday, November 1, 2013

Obama - Pathological Liar

Watch Obama catch himself lying to the world at 0:56. The body language and the unspoken message is unmistakable here. Not just the ear tug, but also the strategic pause are amazing. It is truly amazing what less than a second of body language can tell you - it speaks volumes. Terabytes per second!

 What a 'leader'

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Social Security - Democrats' Rip-Off!

This is a perfect example of the "Generation Effect"!
From Facebook:

History Lesson on Your Social Security Card
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (and some older ones) didn't know this.
It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family
and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter
whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.

Social Security

Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and
Card were not to be used for identification purposes. Since nearly everyone in the
United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the
message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION was removed.

An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION"message.
Our Social Security

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social
Security (FICA) Program. He promised:

1) That participation in the Program would be
completely voluntary,

No longer Voluntary

2) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
incomes into the Program,

Now 7.65%
On the first $90,000.

3) That the money the participants elected to put
into the Program would be deductible from
their income for tax purposes each year,

No longer tax deductible

4) That the money the participants put in went to the
Independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the
General Operating Fund, and therefore, would
only be used to fund the Social Security
Retirement Program, and no other
Government program, and,

Under Johnson the money was moved to
The General Fund and spent.

5) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed
as income.

Under Clinton & Gore
up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are
now receiving a Social Security check every month --
and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of
the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put
away -- you may be interested in the following:

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the
Independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the
General Fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democratically
controlled House and Senate.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax
deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social
Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party with Al Gore casting the
'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the
Senate, while he was Vice President of the U.S.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

Q: Which Political Party decided to start
giving annuity payments to immigrants?


A: That's right!

Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65,
began to receive Social Security payments! The
Democratic Party gave these payments to them,
even though they never paid a dime into it!

------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- ---------

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA),
the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans
want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of
awareness will be planted and maybe changes will

Saturday, September 21, 2013

What is Intelligence?

There are three orders of intelligence: 1) Leadership intelligence, 2) Social intelligence, 3) Technical intelligence.

The lowest order is 3, ‘Technical Intelligence’:
Technical intelligence is simply ‘on paper intelligence,’ or the intelligence we can measure, e.g. IQ. Someone can be amazingly intelligent, in his field, but this kind of intelligence somehow is not enough to describe what we humans understand as ‘whole’ or ‘complete’ intelligence. This kind of intelligence explains how a super smart person can score so well on tests, be the top of his class, or even be a nuclear physicist — but, in everyday life make totally stupid decisions. This person may be intelligent on paper, but he causes just as many traffic jams, votes for demagogues like Obama, and makes just as many stupid decisions and mistakes in normal life, just like anyone else. A person with very high technical intelligence but zero social intelligence cannot recognize a leader or leadership qualities even if they bite him on the ass! This also explains the scientists and academia who voted for Obama — twice!  Which begs the question, “what is intelligence?”

The second order of intelligence is ‘Social Intelligence’:
Social intelligence is the ability to communicate with people effectively, to reach a predetermined goal. But it is much more than that; it also implies situational awareness, the ability to think on your feet and react intelligently to new, unexpected circumstances. It could also be called ‘environmental-intelligence'. But, now here’s the crux, people with social intelligence aren’t necessarily good leaders. They can recognize a leader or leadership qualities, they can even lead a team, depending on their degree of social intelligence, but being socially intelligent does not make you a leader. However, having high social intelligence makes one also less leadable — this person thinks about problems before jumping to a conclusion. ‘Wicked Problems’ are not decided upon quickly or rashly, but first after a great deal of thought and research — never reflexively. Someone with high social intelligence can also recognize demagogues and trends, can discern between propaganda and fact, and can also be critical of himself and recognize when he is being mislead, or if he himself is being biased. This is a very difficult thing to do, and in my opinion is the start of ‘real’ intelligence.

The Highest order of intelligence is ‘Leadership Intelligence’:
Leadership intelligence is the ability to lead in and through unknown situations. A leader possesses all of the social intelligence skills; thinking on your feet, pro-active thinking and acting, being able to communicate and manipulate people effectively etc.  But it is NOT leading from behind. Machiavelli is a perfect example of someone very high in social intelligence, but not leadership intelligence. A Leader does not lead from behind, or behind the scenes — that is Machiavellian, or very high social intelligence, and that’s where the difference is too. Someone with Leadership Intelligence can hold and captivate his followers and yet — he knows that leadership is not just slick words and good presentation skills, it is truly thinking ahead, far, far ahead, and calculating unknown-unknowns, taking risks, sometimes huge risks, and having the perseverance to own his problems and see them through to the very end. Making tough, unpopular decisions is the mark of a leader and indicator — in the negative case — of a demagogue. Now here’s the crux, or double-crux if you will; A good leader, i.e. someone possessing high leadership skills, can also make mistakes — and display low social intelligence — but... this is usually the exception which proves the rule.

Sheeple -- Product of America

Is this girl a sheeple?
We cannot tell from the photo,
hence the questions below:

Did you want to go to war 1 or 2 years ago against Syria?*
Were you protesting the Syrian government already, for the 'atrocities'?
Were you active at all in any kind of protest against the Syrian government?

Do you want to go to war now, or launch a pre-emptive belligerent strike against Syria?

If you answer NO to the first and YES to the second:
Congratulations! You are an emotional-naked-chimpanzee with GURU-SYNDROME!
You let yourself be lead around by the nose by your favorite 'charismatic' politician.
You had no problem with Syria one or two years ago when the 'atrocities' began, but now, because Obama wants a war — you want war also! And you are willing to do anything or say anything to rationalize his position and 'cover' for your man in Washington.
You are a sheep, or at best sheeple. You are officially too stupid to vote, please sit out the next elections.
You probably didn't even know where Syria was until Obama wanted to bomb it.
*This is the crux of the question. John McCaine wanted to strike Syria two years ago already, and he keeps repeating "If Obama would have done what he should have done two years ago, we wouldn't be here today..." [situation with Syria]

Thursday, September 19, 2013

The Political Process

In the present situation:

  1. Motivated Reasoning
    • I want to build a pipeline through Syria -- Assad has to go!
    • The Al Qaeda Terrorists and Insurgents are now "Rebels" and "Freedom Fighters" in a "Civil War" (geez, what an oxymoron!)
  2. Variable Truth
    • War is a tool for Peace
  3. Selective "Justice"
    • Send bombs "for peace"; kill Assad.
    • End effect; Assad is out of the way -- the pipeline gets built.

Has anyone else noticed that two or three years ago there was no problem with Syria and Assad?
Has anyone else noticed that the problems started EXACTLY when Saudi Arabia and Qatar (the pipeline builders) started funding and sending Al Qaeda insurgents and terrorists to Syria?
Has anyone else noticed that the problem started EXACTLY WHEN OBAMA STARTED SUPPORTING THE AL QAEDA "REBELS" IN SYRIA!?!?!?